⅞
What's the real problem with pornography and sex...?
Where does sex connect with love???
Love with marriage?...
It's always said that human beings have evolved.
Centuries ago, marriage served a clear purpose: it was linked to maintaining a dynasty, enduring the family name, and thus ensuring the maintenance of royal power in the same hands. A power supposedly granted by God... Marriage was also arranged to expand fiefdoms and generate powerful alliances against the danger of another ethnic group or people coming to overthrow the rulers and establish themselves in a certain land. They didn't marry for love; sometimes they didn't even like each other, or even hated each other... but they fulfilled the objective of securing power.
Some, the majority, will say that this doesn't happen today... but don't wealthy families choose to maintain their unions with related families of the same social status? Don't people from different backgrounds try to associate with partners who are most similar to them? And at the same time, they use social degradation for those from one class to associate with partners of another class? The terms "upstart," "classless," etc. resonate. Marriage continues to serve the same purpose of maintaining power as restricted as possible. They might say that "bastards" no longer exist and that children are guaranteed social and economic rights... but always within the same class. The law allows someone wealthy to marry someone from another class... but with "prenuptial" laws that prevent wealth from flowing into other hands...
Through Natural Selection, this behavior is internalized, and it begins to be felt that forming similar families is part of being human.
In feudal times, castles were built to separate the "nobility" from the "vassals"... nowadays, castle walls remain invisible to the eye, but they are firmly established in the "per capita income"... if you manage to amass some money, you can have the option of living and working alongside the powerful, but never mingling... let's leave this point for a moment... let's explore what happens between love and sex.
Sexual function... what the hell does it have to do with love??!!!!.. Why is the ability to procreate considered the limiting factor of love...??
The phrase "to have beloved children who don't suffer" is manipulated within the institution of the family..... And we find ourselves once again faced with the systematic control exercised by the church, the military, and royalty... Pairings between similar people, but clearly marking the difference in wealth. With all kinds of obstacles if they intend to break the established order. Once again, natural selection for behavior repeated for centuries and centuries ends up being "internalized" as "human," which "differentiates" us from animals. Power and control are maintained among powerful families. Non-powerful families, if they meet the marriage requirement, are given the opportunity to obtain all kinds of personal and mortgage loans and credits to live the illusion of having risen in social status. And in this socioeconomic task, they are trapped and enslaved to serve the interests of the same people as always... The feeling of "love" is linked to sexual desire with the promise of being able to climb the ladder to power and wealth, and to give free rein to sex "within" the agreement signed before the church or the law, or both... in order to live a peaceful old age, provided that, to keep the family cemented in love, one has worked all or almost all of one's life...
Aaahh, but sexual desire is difficult to rein in; "atavistic," it responds to other instincts, unrelated to love, currently also driven by the attainment of a social status as a superman or superwoman.
Since ancient times, brothels and houses were created where, while away from home, serving as a worker for some power center, one could "let off steam" if need be for a comfortable sum of money. Companies hired their services, but publicly denied them and smeared them. to those who sought to satisfy their sexual desires for money. And the existing link between sex and illness came to provide "scientific" support for sexual practices outside of marriage.
The issue here, however, is "addiction"... The inability to control desires, transforming a normal human activity into a source of risk. But this doesn't only occur in sex; addiction can occur in any activity. But, conveniently, it's relegated to drugs and sex. Working to succeed, destabilizing everything around you, isn't an addiction; changing clothes to look good every day isn't an addiction; coffee, salt, gyms, wanting to stay "young" forever, making money from wars, showing off as a "winner" in front of everyone, etc., etc., etc.
This is the same old story about drug trafficking... They'll never legalize it, but they'll keep it going because the profits are in the billions. A policy of persecution will continue, and from time to time, some "big fish" will be caught bragging about waging war on drugs...
Sex<>Love<>Marriage.
This is the situation we live in, and it's not going to change. Society has established behaviors, judgments, and punishments... all to maintain the invisible feudal wall that surrounds us all...
I don't think there's any ideology that can unravel the fact that repeated behavior... becomes internalized to the point of seeming genetic.
Now, in this same context, from the moment one is born, "everything must be paid for." As Benjamin Franklin said, "Death and Taxes" are the only universal truths....
Love is not given for free...not in marriage, and even less so if the list of conditions that lovers must meet in order to form something and believe that they will enjoy sex to the fullest is not met.... hahaha....
Moreover, if you believe that absolutely everyone who pays for a few hours, nights, days for a "lady of company," commonly referred to as "prostitutes," whores, bitches, etc.... are completely wrong.... Sex is sometimes absolutely secondary, and company, feeling alive, loved, listened to, caressed, is the driving force behind the search..!!!!
And, if the service is top-notch, "..... whoever is paid, meets expectations, has culture, intelligence, sensitivity, time, and, if, in addition, they manage to feel absolutely "at ease" with the buyer... What's the problem??? Why should it be a despised activity???
It's necessary to separate sex from drug trafficking, and to stop believing "illusorily" that governments, large corporations, and socially successful activities are not transversally linked to drug use...
ANY HUMAN ACTIVITY, WITHOUT SELF-CONTROL, TRANSFORMED INTO ADDICTION, GENERATES SUFFERING.
But be very clear that, to maintain power in concentrated power, anything that endorses and aggrandizes it... is valid...!!! And anything that endangers it will quickly be subject to the rules of "marketing"...
IF YOU DO NOT HARM YOURSELF OR OTHERS....ENJOY IT FULLY WHEN THE OPPORTUNITY PRESENTS ITSELF...
Love with marriage?...
It's always said that human beings have evolved.
Centuries ago, marriage served a clear purpose: it was linked to maintaining a dynasty, enduring the family name, and thus ensuring the maintenance of royal power in the same hands. A power supposedly granted by God... Marriage was also arranged to expand fiefdoms and generate powerful alliances against the danger of another ethnic group or people coming to overthrow the rulers and establish themselves in a certain land. They didn't marry for love; sometimes they didn't even like each other, or even hated each other... but they fulfilled the objective of securing power.
Some, the majority, will say that this doesn't happen today... but don't wealthy families choose to maintain their unions with related families of the same social status? Don't people from different backgrounds try to associate with partners who are most similar to them? And at the same time, they use social degradation for those from one class to associate with partners of another class? The terms "upstart," "classless," etc. resonate. Marriage continues to serve the same purpose of maintaining power as restricted as possible. They might say that "bastards" no longer exist and that children are guaranteed social and economic rights... but always within the same class. The law allows someone wealthy to marry someone from another class... but with "prenuptial" laws that prevent wealth from flowing into other hands...
Through Natural Selection, this behavior is internalized, and it begins to be felt that forming similar families is part of being human.
In feudal times, castles were built to separate the "nobility" from the "vassals"... nowadays, castle walls remain invisible to the eye, but they are firmly established in the "per capita income"... if you manage to amass some money, you can have the option of living and working alongside the powerful, but never mingling... let's leave this point for a moment... let's explore what happens between love and sex.
Sexual function... what the hell does it have to do with love??!!!!.. Why is the ability to procreate considered the limiting factor of love...??
The phrase "to have beloved children who don't suffer" is manipulated within the institution of the family..... And we find ourselves once again faced with the systematic control exercised by the church, the military, and royalty... Pairings between similar people, but clearly marking the difference in wealth. With all kinds of obstacles if they intend to break the established order. Once again, natural selection for behavior repeated for centuries and centuries ends up being "internalized" as "human," which "differentiates" us from animals. Power and control are maintained among powerful families. Non-powerful families, if they meet the marriage requirement, are given the opportunity to obtain all kinds of personal and mortgage loans and credits to live the illusion of having risen in social status. And in this socioeconomic task, they are trapped and enslaved to serve the interests of the same people as always... The feeling of "love" is linked to sexual desire with the promise of being able to climb the ladder to power and wealth, and to give free rein to sex "within" the agreement signed before the church or the law, or both... in order to live a peaceful old age, provided that, to keep the family cemented in love, one has worked all or almost all of one's life...
Aaahh, but sexual desire is difficult to rein in; "atavistic," it responds to other instincts, unrelated to love, currently also driven by the attainment of a social status as a superman or superwoman.
Since ancient times, brothels and houses were created where, while away from home, serving as a worker for some power center, one could "let off steam" if need be for a comfortable sum of money. Companies hired their services, but publicly denied them and smeared them. to those who sought to satisfy their sexual desires for money. And the existing link between sex and illness came to provide "scientific" support for sexual practices outside of marriage.
The issue here, however, is "addiction"... The inability to control desires, transforming a normal human activity into a source of risk. But this doesn't only occur in sex; addiction can occur in any activity. But, conveniently, it's relegated to drugs and sex. Working to succeed, destabilizing everything around you, isn't an addiction; changing clothes to look good every day isn't an addiction; coffee, salt, gyms, wanting to stay "young" forever, making money from wars, showing off as a "winner" in front of everyone, etc., etc., etc.
This is the same old story about drug trafficking... They'll never legalize it, but they'll keep it going because the profits are in the billions. A policy of persecution will continue, and from time to time, some "big fish" will be caught bragging about waging war on drugs...
Sex<>Love<>Marriage.
This is the situation we live in, and it's not going to change. Society has established behaviors, judgments, and punishments... all to maintain the invisible feudal wall that surrounds us all...
I don't think there's any ideology that can unravel the fact that repeated behavior... becomes internalized to the point of seeming genetic.
Now, in this same context, from the moment one is born, "everything must be paid for." As Benjamin Franklin said, "Death and Taxes" are the only universal truths....
Love is not given for free...not in marriage, and even less so if the list of conditions that lovers must meet in order to form something and believe that they will enjoy sex to the fullest is not met.... hahaha....
Moreover, if you believe that absolutely everyone who pays for a few hours, nights, days for a "lady of company," commonly referred to as "prostitutes," whores, bitches, etc.... are completely wrong.... Sex is sometimes absolutely secondary, and company, feeling alive, loved, listened to, caressed, is the driving force behind the search..!!!!
And, if the service is top-notch, "..... whoever is paid, meets expectations, has culture, intelligence, sensitivity, time, and, if, in addition, they manage to feel absolutely "at ease" with the buyer... What's the problem??? Why should it be a despised activity???
It's necessary to separate sex from drug trafficking, and to stop believing "illusorily" that governments, large corporations, and socially successful activities are not transversally linked to drug use...
ANY HUMAN ACTIVITY, WITHOUT SELF-CONTROL, TRANSFORMED INTO ADDICTION, GENERATES SUFFERING.
But be very clear that, to maintain power in concentrated power, anything that endorses and aggrandizes it... is valid...!!! And anything that endangers it will quickly be subject to the rules of "marketing"...
IF YOU DO NOT HARM YOURSELF OR OTHERS....ENJOY IT FULLY WHEN THE OPPORTUNITY PRESENTS ITSELF...
The author, I, assume responsibility for what was said and expressed...
- ¿Cómo explicar la "historia de amor" de Albert Einstein y Lina, su violín?
- ¿Cómo explicar los poemas de Neruda?: "Puedo escribir los versos más tristes
esta noche. / Escribir, por ejemplo: "La noche está estrellada, / y tiritan, azules, los astros, a lo lejos" - ¿Quién quiere una explicación científica para la poesía?
Conclusión científica
Los estudios realizados por la antropóloga Hellen Fisher en 2010, ponen en evidencia que el amor provoca los mismos sentimientos placenteros que la droga a nivel cerebral, entonces, el amor sería una respuesta fisiológica más que una emoción.
Numerosas regiones cerebrales, sobre todo aquellas relacionadas con la recompensa y la motivación, se activan cuando estamos con una pareja, como el hipocampo, el hipotálamo o el córtex del cíngulo anterior.
Los estudios realizados por la antropóloga Hellen Fisher en 2010, ponen en evidencia que el amor provoca los mismos sentimientos placenteros que la droga a nivel cerebral, entonces, el amor sería una respuesta fisiológica más que una emoción.
Numerosas regiones cerebrales, sobre todo aquellas relacionadas con la recompensa y la motivación, se activan cuando estamos con una pareja, como el hipocampo, el hipotálamo o el córtex del cíngulo anterior.
¿Pueden hombres y mujeres ser solo amigos?
Un estudio de la Universidad de Wisconsin (realizado en un centenar de jovenes)concluyó que la amistad entre individuos de distinto sexo no era posible al constatar que una de las partes, cuando no las dos, acaba por desarrollar en algún momento un grado distinto de atracción sexual.
Según el estudio, hombres y mujeres tienen una percepción muy distinta de los mensajes que reciben del sexo opuesto.
In all the songs published here there is a reference to the topic being discussed,,,,,,, In future publications, we will go deeper into it until we drown, hahaha
ReplyDelete